I am still coming to terms with the KBox mishap yesterday. What I managed to do defies belief. I managed to repeatedly insult Cheuk Ho on his birthday. I managed to ruin the mood at the place with an ill-timed and ill-judged glass smashing act. The most shocking bit, however, is the way I managed to do these without realising anything amiss or pondering any consequences. It scares me how indiscretionate and callous I seem to have become. Just about everybody in attendance has branded me a person without EQ or SQ, and not without cause. I do not wish to delve into how misjudging the trajectory of a loaded bag of stuff has at best a tenuous link to EQ or SQ because then I'll be accused of refuting these people's claims which just have to be absolutely and wholly true. Fair enough. I cannot be right, it's not allowed.
Don't get me wrong, I am not angry. I never am. I am too aloof as to be bothered with the opinions of people around me. And perhaps therein lies the whole EQ/SQ problem. My emotions are sealed from almost everyone else. Just try making me angry or happy. It is difficult preempting people's responses and ensuring you don't anger or upset them when you never actually experience such feelings yourself as a result of their actions (because you are too self-contained and arrogant, but still). I have no idea where to go to be really honest. To solve this problem (which is so not in my nature; my first inclination is always to run from difficulty rather than face it) I have to be able to emotionally immerse myself within normal and daily situations, which would erode the unflappability and pseudo-invincibility I have prided myself in. See, hubris is in the way again. But the occasions when I say something really daft (or insulting) that irks people around (without even realising that it does so) have developed a disconcerting frequency. And yet I don't see why I should conform to socially-defined ideals of good EQ/SQ at the expense of the personality I have assumed and grown into. Aren't we past the modernist paradigm of societies determining their collective rightness and wrongness, and into the individualist era?
I don't know but I am confused. Why am I even concerned that I don't really matter or mean anything to anyone when I know they don't matter or mean enough to me to influence my predominant emotions? To those this is related to thanks a lot for confusing me. At least that's one thing you've succeeded in doing. I should just shut up from now on and keep to myself. Nobody will feel the absence anyway. To those unconcerned who are asking "what is going on here" sorry that I'm shoving my troubles across without any cogency or purpose. But isn't that what our online identities are like? We remove our person from our words and just let them sting whosoever appears. Life sucks.
10 years ago